NST research

Do you need cardio if you lift weights?

Lifting is genuinely good for your heart, it independently lowers cardiovascular and all cause mortality risk. But it is not a full substitute for cardio: aerobic training does far more for cardiorespiratory fitness, and the biggest health return comes from doing both.
Research-basedReviewed by Gabriel SilvaLast verified 12 September 2026Next review due 14 March 2027Report a correction

The evidence-led answer

NST verdict

If you lift weights regularly, you are already doing something real for your heart. Strength training is independently linked to a lower risk of dying from cardiovascular disease and other causes, and a major heart health body considers it a safe, effective way to improve cardiovascular health. But it is not a full substitute for cardio. Aerobic training does considerably more for your cardiorespiratory fitness, a strong predictor of long term health, and in a head to head trial, only the group doing both lifting and cardio lowered their blood pressure. The largest reductions in mortality risk come from doing both kinds of exercise. So keep lifting, and add some cardio. You do not have to choose.

Is lifting good for your heart?

Yes, genuinely, and on its own. A pooled analysis of 16 long term studies found that muscle strengthening activity was independently associated, on top of any aerobic exercise, with roughly a 10 to 17% lower risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, total cancer and diabetes. The American Heart Association's 2023 scientific statement concludes that resistance training is a safe and effective way to improve cardiovascular health in adults with and without cardiovascular disease, and that it improves a range of heart disease risk factors.

Most of that benefit comes from a modest amount. The mortality and cardiovascular associations were J shaped, with the biggest risk reduction at around 30 to 60 minutes of muscle strengthening activity per week. That is the health dose. It is separate from how much training volume it takes to build muscle.

Where lifting falls short of cardio

Two places. Cardiorespiratory fitness: aerobic training raises your VO2max, your body's capacity to use oxygen, far more than lifting does. In a time matched 8 week trial, aerobic only training raised VO2max by about 7.7 mL/kg/min, combined training by about 4.9, and resistance only training by little. Cardiorespiratory fitness is one of the strongest predictors of long term mortality, so this gap matters.

Blood pressure: in the same trial, neither resistance only nor aerobic only training lowered blood pressure over the 8 weeks; only the combined programme did, and combined training also produced the best overall profile across blood pressure, fitness, strength and lean mass. And in the long term data, the largest reductions in mortality come from people who do both muscle strengthening and aerobic activity.

So how much of each?

You do not have to pick a side. Keep lifting for strength, muscle and its own cardiovascular benefit. Then add aerobic work: general public health guidelines suggest roughly 150 minutes a week of moderate activity, brisk walking, cycling, jogging, rowing, a class, or about 75 minutes of vigorous activity, split across two to four sessions, alongside your two days of strengthening. If your time is limited, combined sessions, some lifting plus some cardio in the same workout, are an efficient way to get both.

What this means in practice

Keep your lifting. It is not "wasted" heart health time; it lowers your risk independently, and a modest weekly amount captures most of that. But schedule some cardio too: a couple of dedicated sessions a week, or cardio bolted onto the end of lifting days, aiming loosely at the 150 minutes moderate guideline. If you genuinely cannot fit both, prioritise not dropping either entirely, since even a small amount of each beats a lot of one and none of the other. And if you have known heart disease, symptoms like chest pain, breathlessness or palpitations, or major risk factors, check with a doctor before adding hard cardio. This is general information, not medical advice.

Practical meaning

Keep lifting, since it lowers cardiovascular and all cause mortality risk independently, and a modest weekly amount captures most of that. Add aerobic work too: aim loosely at the general guideline of about 150 minutes a week of moderate activity (or 75 vigorous) across two to four sessions, alongside two days of strengthening. Combined sessions are efficient when time is tight; do not drop either kind entirely. See a doctor before adding hard cardio if you have known heart disease, symptoms, or major risk factors.

Limitations and uncertainty

The mortality figures come from observational cohort studies, so association, not proven causation, and the J shape means the value of higher strengthening volume for mortality is unclear. The training comparison trial is small (69 people), 8 weeks, in sedentary adults with elevated blood pressure, so its VO2max and blood pressure numbers are short term and group specific. The AHA document is a scientific statement, not a fresh pooled analysis. The 150 and 75 minute figures are standard public health guideline numbers, not from the cited studies.

No product needed

This page is here to answer the question, not force a product.

Some research pages are deliberately product-free because adding a retailer link would not help the reader make a better decision. When a product is genuinely relevant, it appears after the evidence and is clearly labelled.

Evidence behind this page

What the evidence says, and where it stops.

Lifting weights is itself good for the heart, and a modest weekly amount captures most of the independent benefit

moderate confidence

Yes. A pooled analysis of 16 cohort studies found muscle strengthening activity was associated, independently of aerobic activity, with roughly a 10-17% lower risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, total cancer and diabetes. The American Heart Association's 2023 scientific statement concludes resistance training is a safe and effective way to improve cardiovascular health in adults with and without cardiovascular disease, improving traditional and non traditional risk factors. Most of the independent benefit comes from a modest amount: the mortality and cardiovascular associations were J shaped, with the largest risk reduction at around 30 to 60 minutes of muscle strengthening activity per week, the health dose, separate from the training volume that builds muscle.

Study context and sources
Who it may apply to
Adults across 16 prospective cohorts (S2); healthy and clinical adult populations (S1 statement).
Limitations
Observational data (association not causation); self reported activity; the J shape means the value of higher strengthening volume for mortality is unclear; S1 is a statement, not a pooled analysis.

Lifting is not a full substitute for aerobic exercise

moderate confidence

No, in two ways. Cardiorespiratory fitness: aerobic training raises VO2max far more than lifting, in a time matched 8 week trial, aerobic only training raised VO2max by about 7.7 mL/kg/min, combined training by about 4.9, and resistance only training by little; cardiorespiratory fitness is among the strongest predictors of long term mortality risk. Blood pressure: in the same trial, neither resistance only nor aerobic only training lowered blood pressure over 8 weeks, only the combined programme did, and combined training gave the best overall profile across blood pressure, fitness, strength and lean mass. The VO2max and blood pressure numbers are short term and specific to that group of sedentary adults with elevated blood pressure.

Study context and sources
Who it may apply to
69 sedentary adults with elevated blood pressure and overweight/obesity, 8 week RCT.
Limitations
Small, short trial; surrogate outcomes; exact effect sizes are group specific; the mortality relevance of VO2max is context, not from this trial.

The biggest health return comes from doing both; a practical steer

moderate confidence

Do both. In the long term cohort data, the largest reductions in all cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality come from people doing both muscle strengthening and aerobic activity, and in the training comparison trial combined training produced the best overall risk factor profile. Practically: keep lifting for strength, muscle and its own cardiovascular benefit, and add aerobic work, general public health guidelines suggest roughly 150 minutes a week of moderate activity (brisk walking, cycling, jogging, rowing, a class) or about 75 minutes of vigorous activity, split across two to four sessions, alongside two days of strengthening. If time is limited, combined sessions (some lifting plus some cardio) are efficient; do not drop either kind entirely. If you have known heart disease, symptoms such as chest pain, breathlessness or palpitations, or major risk factors, check with a doctor before adding hard cardio. General information, not medical advice.

Study context and sources
Who it may apply to
Cohort populations (S2) and the training comparison trial (S3); practical guidance is general.
Limitations
The combined is best mortality data are observational; the 150/75 minute figures are general public health guideline numbers, not from the cited studies; the practical steer is an editorial synthesis.

Related research, practical guidance, and comparisons to help with your next decision.

Compare options

Adjustable vs fixed dumbbells: which fits your home setup?

A practical comparison of storage, weight changes, increments and handling guidance. No direct trial comparing the formats was identified, so the decision stays focused on your space, loading needs and training style.

Last verified

Research

Should you stretch before exercising?

Static stretching can improve range of motion, but it is not the whole warm-up. Long holds can briefly reduce isolated maximal force; updated evidence does not support a blanket ban on stretching before sport.

Last verified