NST research

Does creatine cause hair loss?

Probably not. The worry comes from one 2009 study that measured a DHT rise after creatine loading and never looked at hair. The only trial to directly measure hair follicle health, a 12 week RCT in 2025, found no effect on hormones or hair. Limits remain: one short study in young men.
Research-basedReviewed by Gabriel SilvaLast verified 12 September 2026Next review due 14 March 2027Report a correction

The evidence-led answer

NST verdict

On current evidence, no, creatine does not appear to cause hair loss. The worry traces to a single 2009 study that found a rise in the hormone DHT after creatine loading in a group of rugby players. That study never measured hair, and no one has directly repeated its hormone finding since. In 2025 a randomised controlled trial finally measured both the hormones and the hair, density, follicle counts, hair thickness, in men taking 5 grams of creatine a day for 12 weeks, and found no difference from placebo on any of them. The honest caveat is that this is still one short study in young men, so a small or very long term effect is not completely ruled out. But there is no good evidence based reason to avoid creatine for fear of losing your hair.

Where did the creatine hair loss idea come from?

From one study, in 2009. A crossover trial in 20 college aged male rugby players found that after a week of creatine loading, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) rose by around 56%, and the ratio of DHT to testosterone by around 36%. Both stayed elevated, about 40% and 22% above baseline, through two more weeks on a maintenance dose. Total testosterone itself did not change. The crucial detail: this study did not measure hair at all, not hair count, not thickness, not shedding. It measured a hormone ratio and nothing else. The authors themselves called for further investigation.

Does creatine raise DHT, and does that matter?

DHT is the androgen most closely linked to male pattern hair loss, so a study showing a DHT rise is a fair thing to take seriously and follow up. But two things temper it. First, a change in a blood hormone ratio is not the same as hair loss: follicles miniaturising and hair actually thinning is the outcome that matters, and the 2009 study did not look at it. Second, the 2009 hormone finding has never been directly replicated; it remains a single result in a single small group. So the mechanism was plausible enough to check, which is exactly what eventually happened.

What happened when someone actually measured hair?

In 2025, a double blind randomised controlled trial did the direct test. It gave 38 resistance trained men either 5 grams of creatine monohydrate a day or a placebo for 12 weeks, and measured total testosterone, free testosterone, DHT and the DHT to testosterone ratio, along with hair follicle health, hair density, follicular unit count, cumulative hair thickness, and a Trichogram. There were no differences between the creatine and placebo groups for any hormone or any hair measure. The researchers described the result as strong evidence against the claim that creatine contributes to hair loss.

What do the experts say?

A widely cited review of creatine misconceptions concludes that the evidence does not show creatine causes hair loss or baldness. The International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand reports that creatine is well tolerated in long term use, doses up to 30 grams a day for five years in healthy people, with no signal of androgenic side effects.

So is it settled?

Not completely, and it is worth being honest about that. The direct evidence is still one 12 week trial in young men. It cannot rule out a small effect the study was not powered to detect, an effect that only shows up over years rather than weeks, or an effect specific to people who are genetically prone to male pattern baldness and who use high doses. What the 2025 trial does do is remove the main empirical reason people cite for avoiding creatine, and it is the only study that has ever actually looked at hair.

If you do take creatine, which one?

Creatine monohydrate is a commodity. The effective, well studied form is plain creatine monohydrate at about 3 to 5 grams a day, with no loading phase needed; the creatine article covers dosing. Fancier forms, hydrochloride, buffered, liquid, cost more without a proven advantage. So the honest recommendation is a category, not a brand: any plain creatine monohydrate that is single ingredient and, ideally, carries a purity mark such as Creapure or third party testing (Informed Sport, NSF). The products listed with this article are review pending candidates only, NST has not tested them, and no price, rating, ranking or affiliate link has been recorded. A reviewer verifies each against the product review brief before any of this becomes a recommendation.

What this means in practice

If you want the strength and muscle benefits of creatine, the hair loss claim is not a strong reason to skip it. If you are still cautious, the standard 3 to 5 grams a day as a maintenance dose, with no loading phase, is the lowest exposure way to take it, and it is exactly the dose the 2025 trial used. If you already have male pattern hair loss and want certainty for your own situation, raise it with a doctor or dermatologist rather than guessing. Nothing here is a reason to start or stop a hair treatment.

Practical meaning

If you want the strength and muscle benefits of creatine, the hair loss claim is not a strong reason to skip it. If you are still cautious, the standard 3 to 5 grams a day as a maintenance dose, with no loading phase, is the lowest exposure way to take it, and it is exactly the dose the 2025 trial used. If you already have male pattern hair loss and want certainty for your own situation, raise it with a doctor or dermatologist rather than guessing. Nothing here is a reason to start or stop a hair treatment.

Limitations and uncertainty

Only one study has ever measured hair outcomes with creatine; there is no pooled analysis on this specific question, and there cannot be one yet. That study is 12 weeks, in young resistance trained men, so it does not speak to years of use, older users, women, or people with diagnosed androgenetic alopecia on higher doses. The 2009 hormone study was small (20 people), short (three weeks), in one sport at one site, used a high loading dose, and measured only a hormone ratio. Three of the four sources here are Journal of the ISSN publications whose authors have industry ties, so the direct trial's finding should be checked against any future independent replication. This article is only about creatine and hair, not the causes or treatment of hair loss.

No product needed

This page is here to answer the question, not force a product.

Some research pages are deliberately product-free because adding a retailer link would not help the reader make a better decision. When a product is genuinely relevant, it appears after the evidence and is clearly labelled.

Evidence behind this page

What the evidence says, and where it stops.

The creatine hair loss claim traces to one 2009 hormone study that did not measure hair

moderate confidence

The concern originates from a single 2009 double blind crossover trial in 20 college aged male rugby players. After a week of creatine loading, dihydrotestosterone (DHT) rose about 56% and the DHT to testosterone ratio about 36%, remaining roughly 40% and 22% above baseline through two weeks of a maintenance dose; total testosterone did not change. DHT is the androgen most associated with male pattern hair loss, so the signal was worth following up. However, the study measured only a blood hormone ratio: it did not assess hair count, thickness or shedding in any way, and its hormone finding has not been directly replicated since.

Study context and sources
Who it may apply to
20 college aged male rugby players in one training environment.
Limitations
Small, short, single sport and site; high loading dose; hormone ratio surrogate only; never directly replicated; no hair measurement, so it cannot by itself support or refute a hair loss claim.

The one trial that measured hair found no effect of creatine

moderate confidence

A 2025 double blind randomised controlled trial gave 38 resistance trained men (of 45 randomised) either 5 g/day creatine monohydrate or a placebo for 12 weeks and measured total testosterone, free testosterone, DHT and the DHT:testosterone ratio together with hair follicle health: hair density, follicular unit count, cumulative hair thickness and a Trichogram. There were no group by time differences between creatine and placebo for any hormone or any hair measure. Testosterone changes seen over time occurred equally in both groups and were unrelated to supplementation. The authors describe the result as strong evidence against the claim that creatine contributes to hair loss. This is the only study to have measured hair outcomes with creatine.

Study context and sources
Who it may apply to
38 healthy resistance trained men aged 18 to 40 who completed the trial.
Limitations
Single trial; 12 weeks; young men only; one dose (5 g/day); JISSN publication with author industry ties; not independently replicated; cannot exclude a small effect or one emerging over years.

Sources

Expert reviews do not support a hair loss effect, but the direct evidence is still thin

moderate confidence

An evidence based review of common creatine misconceptions concludes the evidence does not show creatine causes hair loss or baldness, and the ISSN position stand reports creatine is well tolerated in long term use (up to 30 g/day for 5 years in healthy people) with no androgenic adverse effect signal. Weighed together with the 2025 trial, the current evidence does not support avoiding creatine to protect hair. The honest limits: the only hair specific evidence is one 12 week study in young men, so a small effect, an effect over years, or an effect in people genetically prone to male pattern baldness using high doses cannot be fully ruled out. For someone still cautious, the standard 3 to 5 g/day maintenance dose with no loading phase is the lowest exposure option and is the dose the 2025 trial used; anyone with existing male pattern hair loss wanting certainty should speak to a doctor or dermatologist.

Study context and sources
Who it may apply to
Healthy exercising adults; expert panel syntheses plus the single hair trial.
Limitations
Expert sources are JISSN publications with industry ties; no pooled analysis exists on this specific question and cannot yet; the practical dosing steer is an editorial synthesis.

Related research, practical guidance, and comparisons to help with your next decision.

Research

Do you need protein right after a workout? The "anabolic window"

Muscle is more responsive to protein after training, but the window lasts hours, not the popular half hour, and a meal beforehand widens it further. Once daily protein is adequate, timing around a session makes little measurable difference, and a shake afterwards is optional.

Last verified

Research

Are eggs bad for your cholesterol?

For most healthy people, no. Up to about one egg a day is not linked to higher heart disease or stroke risk in large studies. Eggs nudge blood LDL up a little, but the net effect is small. The bigger issue is what you eat with them, a fry up is not 'an egg'.

Last verified

Research

Can you build muscle and lose fat at the same time?

Yes, gaining muscle while losing fat is real and documented. It works best for people newer to training or carrying more fat who eat plenty of protein, train hard, and keep any calorie deficit modest. For lean, experienced lifters it is slow, and focused gain then lose phases can be more efficient.

Last verified